Donald J. Pliner Blue & Green Beaded Platforms,
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh defended himself in an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal. He says you can trust him to be impartial. Did he undo the damage he did during his hearing last week?
Just a reminder: the purpose of this blog is to reveal what’s really going on with written communications. I’m not here to argue Kavanaugh’s credentials or how senators decide how to vote. The question I’ll address is more specific: did his op-ed do what it was intended to do?
Christian Louboutin Super Dombasle 160 Black Velvet and Lacquered Cork Platforms,Tory Burch Tan Pacey 65 Mm Wdge - Equestrian Calf/Patent Wedges,La Canadienne Black Erica Waterproof Suede Wedges,Stuart Weitzman Sand Metal Madras Wingspan Wedges,Stuart Weitzman Swamp Alex Crochet Sandal Wedges,Saint Laurent Black Floral Espadrille Wedges,Christian Louboutin Black and Gold Private Number Platforms,Anyi Lu Leopard Patent The Kelly Wedges,Alexander Wang Beige Alla Peep Toe Wedges,Brian Atwood White Patent Leather Sandals Wedges,Salvatore Ferragamo Pink Blush Pleated Leather Peep Toe Slides Wedges,B.O.C. Brown Womens Born Concept Trudy Mary Jane Heels Casual Wedges,Jimmy Choo Anthracite Velvet Lana 100 Pumps,Marni Salmon Pink Black Taupe Green 000 Platforms,Fendi Beige Strappy Leather Open Toe Sandals WedgesJessica Simpson Lavender Peep Toe Wedges,Salvatore Ferragamo Gold Leather Sz: M Sandals Wedges,Saint Laurent Black / White Shoes-3145 Platforms,Cole Haan Brown Chelsea Stilleto Pump PlatformsEscada Silver Strappy Sandal Heel Formal Shoes,Christian Louboutin White/Gold Madmonica 60 Wedges,Giuseppe Zanotti Black and Nude Patent Leather Crisscross Heel Sandals #giusz20119 Formal ShoesGiuseppe Zanotti Pink Jenny 115 Platforms,Stuart Weitzman Gold Sandals Leather Formal Shoes,Diane von Furstenberg Black Brown Nude WedgesJimmy Choo Braxen Leopard Print Peep Toe Wedges,Cole Haan Brown Men's Grandev?lution Wingtip Oxford Formal Shoes,Jimmy Choo Gold Chiara Metallic 41 Wedges,Miu Miu Navy Denim Blue/Ivory/Green/Teal 313006501 Platforms,Christian Louboutin Black Commandanta 120 Platforms,
Since my nomination in July, there’s been a frenzy on the left to come up with something, anything to block my confirmation. Shortly after I was nominated, the Democratic Senate leader said he would “oppose me with everything he’s got.” A Democratic senator on this committee publicly referred to me as evil. Evil. Think about that word. And said that those that supported me were “complicit and evil.” Another Democratic senator on this committee said, “Judge Kavanaugh is your worst nightmare.” A former head of the Democratic National Committee said, “Judge Kavanaugh will threaten the lives of millions of Americans for decades to come.”
This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit, fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election, fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record, revenge on behalf of the Clintons and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups.
This is the hole Kavanaugh is attempting to dig himself out of.
The ROAM analysis of Judge Kavanaugh’s op-ed
Franco Sarto Olive Gray Suede Pumps Wedges,Pierre Dumas Silver "Glass Slippers" Formal Shoes,Gianni Bini Nude Platform Sandal Formal Shoes,Christian Louboutin Cross Me Pump Platforms,Miu Miu Black Glitter Calfskin Strappy PlatformsGuess Blue & Brown Batini Wedge Sandals Platforms,FLY London Red Yag Patent Mary Jane Pumps Wedges,Valentino Rockstud Bronze Gold Espadrille Open Toe Sandals 40 Wedges,Tory Burch Camel with Gold Hardware Brown Cameron Logo Leather Thong Sandals Wedges,Stuart Weitzman Navy Blue Satin Formal Shoes,Christian Louboutin Multicolor Trash Slingback Peep Toe Heels PlatformsRoberto Cavalli Red Womens Patent Slip Ons Platforms,Nine West Black Stencil Cut-out Cork Endine PlatformsBadgley Mischka Silver Carley Ii Gladiator Sandals 029 Wedges,Stuart Weitzman Black Patent Leather Peep-toe Heels Wedges,Hermès Tan Neutral Brown Cream Espadrille Wedges,Balenciaga Black Snakeskin Patent Cracked Strappy WedgesChristian Louboutin Black Lady Lynch 120 Patent Calf Formal Shoes,Giuseppe Zanotti Multi-color Design Women's Chain Wedges Sandals Platforms,Christian Louboutin Blue Khol Glittered Drapesse 160 Spotlight Platforms,Christian Louboutin Pink Bianca 120 Suede Pump 40 PlatformsJimmy Choo Nude with Metallic Gold WedgesElizabeth and James Black Prim WedgesJimmy Choo Nude Bergen Patent Heel WedgesStuart Weitzman Blue Suade Alisa Formal Shoes,Hermès Grosgrain Banded Colorblock Open Toe Calfskin Heels 37.5 Formal Shoes,Saint Laurent Nero Apache (Textured Bronze) Tribtoo 105 Pump Platforms,Cole Haan Black Patent Leather Carma Ot PlatformsCasadei Orange and Tan Feminine Ankle Strap Flowers Greatprice Spring Girlie New Sexandthecity Platforms,Tory Burch Black Eddie Lamb Leather Wedges,
- Readers. Who is the op-ed aimed at? Two groups. First, the broader judicial and legal community, who will be arguing cases in front of Kavanaugh and discussing his opinions. And second, the four senators who remain undecided and may decide the fate of his nomination.
- Objective. What change is the op-ed trying to create? The title of the op-ed is “I Am an Independent, Impartial Judge.” So there’s no mystery here: Kavanaugh seeks to dispel the impression he created that he is a biased hothead, and replace it with the idea that he is an appropriate choice for the Supreme Court.
- Action. Kavanaugh wants the senators to vote for him and the legal community to respect him.
- iMpression. Much more than most pieces of writing, this one must leave a good impression. If the oral testimony was wild, the op-ed must be rational, well-argued, and free from bias.
Did the op-ed do its job?
Let’s take a look at some excerpts from the op-ed:
I Am an Independent, Impartial Judge
Yes, I was emotional last Thursday. I hope everyone can understand I was there as a son, husband and dad.
. . . [A] good judge must be an umpire—a neutral and impartial arbiter who favors no political party, litigant or policy. As Justice Kennedy has stated, judges do not make decisions to reach a preferred result. Judges make decisions because the law and the Constitution compel the result. Over the past 12 years, I have ruled sometimes for the prosecution and sometimes for criminal defendants, sometimes for workers and sometimes for businesses, sometimes for environmentalists and sometimes for coal miners. In each case, I have followed the law. I do not decide cases based on personal or policy preferences. I am not a pro-plaintiff or pro-defendant judge. I am not a pro-prosecution or pro-defense judge. I am a pro-law judge. . . .
The Supreme Court must never be viewed as a partisan institution. The justices do not sit on opposite sides of an aisle. They do not caucus in separate rooms. As I have said repeatedly, if confirmed to the court, I would be part of a team of nine, committed to deciding cases according to the Constitution and laws of the United States. I would always strive to be a team player. . . .
I testified before the Judiciary Committee last Thursday to defend my family, my good name and my lifetime of public service. My hearing testimony was forceful and passionate. That is because I forcefully and passionately denied the allegation against me. At times, my testimony—both in my opening statement and in response to questions—reflected my overwhelming frustration at being wrongly accused, without corroboration, of horrible conduct completely contrary to my record and character. My statement and answers also reflected my deep distress at the unfairness of how this allegation has been handled.
I was very emotional last Thursday, more so than I have ever been. I might have been too emotional at times. I know that my tone was sharp, and I said a few things I should not have said. I hope everyone can understand that I was there as a son, husband and dad. I testified with five people foremost in my mind: my mom, my dad, my wife, and most of all my daughters.
Going forward, you can count on me to be the same kind of judge and person I have been for my entire 28-year legal career: hardworking, even-keeled, open-minded, independent and dedicated to the Constitution and the public good. As a judge, I have always treated colleagues and litigants with the utmost respect. I have been known for my courtesy on and off the bench. I have not changed. I will continue to be the same kind of judge I have been for the last 12 years. . . .
I revere the Constitution. I believe that an independent and impartial judiciary is essential to our constitutional republic. If confirmed by the Senate to serve on the Supreme Court, I will keep an open mind in every case and always strive to preserve the Constitution of the United States and the American rule of law.
So, did the op-ed do its job?
Judge Kavanaugh does not in this description apologize for anything he said. He did not apologize in the op-ed for his response to Senator Klobuchar, or for his citation of the Clintons and left-wing opposition groups.
As close as he gets is “I might have been too emotional at times. I know that my tone was sharp, and I said a few things I should not have said.” There are no specifics. His reasoning behind this statement is that he was there as a son, a husband, and a dad. (Wasn’t he there as a Supreme Court nominee?)
The rest of the op-ed is clear, reasoned, and sober. It basically says, “judge me by my record.” This is fair. But it does not undo the impression left by Kavanaugh’s testimony in the Senate.
Basically, if you feel you did something wrong and were criticized, you have two possible options. You can say “I did this specific thing, and I’m sorry.” Or you can say “I was right. I don’t need to apologize.”
Kavanaugh attempted a third option: “I made mistakes, but I won’t be specific about them, and I had an excuse because I felt threatened and was acting as a father.” This never works. It is not an effective strategy for a corporate executive or, for that matter, for any adult, let alone a nominee for Supreme Court Justice.
You may or may not believe it is fair to condemn Kavanaugh for a woman’s accusations about what he did in high school 36 years ago.
But it is certainly fair to judge him for what he said, and how he said it, in the Senate last week.
Judge Kavanaugh’s op-ed says, basically “I am fair and impartial when I am a judge, but I am combative and emotional when I am criticized, and I react as an angry father, not as a judge.”
If you believe that a judge should be evaluated only on what does on the bench, and not on his other behavior, then you’ll be fine with this.
But if you believe a judge should be evaluated on what he says and how he acts during confirmation hearings, the op-ed fails. It does not undo any of the impressions that Kavanaugh left. It’s a waste of time, and will change nothing.
ALA?A Fuschia Black Pink Platforms Studded Lasercut Suede Sandal Platforms Pink bbc2b5